i donr think so..many a times it happens dat persons wd gud score or percentage dont go farther…if dey didnt contain domain knwldge wheras persons wd low marks may hv greatr potential dan higher percentage one…!marks is not important criteria having knwledge is more important..
No, certainly not. Because there are many examples where marks are not so good bt knowledge was awsome. People should not be judged by marks, but their knowledge must be the criteria for judgement.
As per the saying goes that knowledge & behavior aren’t measured on the same scale and if knowledge.. reflected and perceived by the marks gets an upper hand then it should be noted down that behavior is everything. Marks provide a gateway but the behavioral etiquette keep the individual going on in the life. Marks can NEVER judge the person’s knowledge!
Marks definitely serve as the academic performance record, so as to be judged on academic knowledge & that one has enough brains to memorize.
But, we all know that many things go for count, about what we write on paper. Having knowledge & getting that down on paper are, sometimes, different things.
Besides, getting marks depends on how much can u put in your brains & ink that down; but comprehending skill is one different thing.
Last, but not the least, there are many other things that make a personality which prove decisive about the productivity at work. As many people say, 90% of what we learn comes in no use, when we deal with practical situations.
no i dont think so..person having marks not knowledge may not go farther…many a times it happens dat person with lessr marks are taken…marks doesnt matter it do..bt to some extent only..what matters is the knowledge..
no i don’t think so .Students have been chosen as their potential and area of interest
no students should be chosen as their potential and area of interest
nopes nt at all… no1 can be judge by the marks. There should be some constant evaluation for judging.. 🙂
i donr think so..many a times it happens dat persons wd gud score or percentage dont go farther…if dey didnt contain domain knwldge wheras persons wd low marks may hv greatr potential dan higher percentage one…!marks is not important criteria having knwledge is more important..
No, certainly not. Because there are many examples where marks are not so good bt knowledge was awsome. People should not be judged by marks, but their knowledge must be the criteria for judgement.
As per the saying goes that knowledge & behavior aren’t measured on the same scale and if knowledge.. reflected and perceived by the marks gets an upper hand then it should be noted down that behavior is everything. Marks provide a gateway but the behavioral etiquette keep the individual going on in the life. Marks can NEVER judge the person’s knowledge!
no..the overall personality of a person matters a lot..and if one believes in the chronicles even back-benchers have done wonders…………
Marks definitely serve as the academic performance record, so as to be judged on academic knowledge & that one has enough brains to memorize.
But, we all know that many things go for count, about what we write on paper. Having knowledge & getting that down on paper are, sometimes, different things.
Besides, getting marks depends on how much can u put in your brains & ink that down; but comprehending skill is one different thing.
Last, but not the least, there are many other things that make a personality which prove decisive about the productivity at work. As many people say, 90% of what we learn comes in no use, when we deal with practical situations.
no i dont think so..person having marks not knowledge may not go farther…many a times it happens dat person with lessr marks are taken…marks doesnt matter it do..bt to some extent only..what matters is the knowledge..