Raising up institutions won’t help at all in bringing quality education to the children.. if we really want to make a fruitful upbringing of the next generation then improvement, revitalization and amendments need to be done at the existing levels.
Once done we can move on to higher levels of education.
I would say that we can not compare IIT/IIM with primary education. This is because the scope of primary education is very vast while IIT/IIM are concerned with a small group of people in India. So I would say that the ultimate concern of government is to develop India and these both are necessary for the growth of India, so govt. Should work for development of both the fields of education.
I would not directly say that govt should stop financing to IIT/IIM but would say that most of the people going for these institutes are self capable, so govt. Should make them self financed. Why primary education is to be developed is also man imp. Question because a child does not join IIT/IIM from his birth. He first gets primary edu. & then on the basis of his capability he reaches to IIT/IIM, so unless the quality of primary education is developed there is no meaning of IIT/IIM.
The other thing why IIT/IIM is needed is also need to be understood. Our India is still a developing country plus we have the largest democracy system in the world so to run them we need smart policy makers and brains which can be provided only by quality education of IIT/IIM.
So I conclude the concern of govt. Should be balanced development of both the fields of education.
The problem is with the “not so good” standard, in comparision to the global standards.
The Government should target to condition the existing education system, to make the product better!
I would say that we can not compare IIT/IIM with primary education. This is because the scope of primary education is very vast while IIT/IIM are concerned with a small group of people in India. So I would say that the ultimate concern of government is to develop India and these both are necessary for the growth of India, so govt. Should work for development of both the fields of education.
I would not directly say that govt should stop financing to IIT/IIM but would say that most of the people going for these institutes are self capable, so govt. Should make them self financed. Why primary education is to be developed is also man imp. Question because a child does not join IIT/IIM from his birth. He first gets primary edu. & then on the basis of his capability he reaches to IIT/IIM, so unless the quality of primary education is developed there is no meaning of IIT/IIM.
The other thing why IIT/IIM is needed is also need to be understood. Our India is still a developing country plus we have the largest democracy system in the world so to run them we need smart policy makers and brains which can be provided only by quality education of IIT/IIM.
So I conclude the concern of govt. Should be balanced development of both the fields of education.
see iit or iim produce the most qualified and talented brains for our future but these brains only devlop from the grass root level i.e. primary education. its the matter of fact that, primary/secondary schools are more as compared to that of iits or iims…then say me why now also india is suffering from unemployment, poverty and the so called IILITERACY. thing is that we should focus on the quality of education not on the quantity of education. and this type of quality education can be epected from the primary education. if a child is not capable of pronouncing words like A,B,C… then how can we expect that he should say the formula of (A-B)^2…a tree grows only from its seed not its vice-vesa..so to see a beautiful tree we need to water the seed which we had put on the soil. like that only we need to polish those primary schools which were setup in our past rather than going for the set up of iits or iims.
thank you.
no need….
Raising up institutions won’t help at all in bringing quality education to the children.. if we really want to make a fruitful upbringing of the next generation then improvement, revitalization and amendments need to be done at the existing levels.
Once done we can move on to higher levels of education.
I would say that we can not compare IIT/IIM with primary education. This is because the scope of primary education is very vast while IIT/IIM are concerned with a small group of people in India. So I would say that the ultimate concern of government is to develop India and these both are necessary for the growth of India, so govt. Should work for development of both the fields of education.
I would not directly say that govt should stop financing to IIT/IIM but would say that most of the people going for these institutes are self capable, so govt. Should make them self financed. Why primary education is to be developed is also man imp. Question because a child does not join IIT/IIM from his birth. He first gets primary edu. & then on the basis of his capability he reaches to IIT/IIM, so unless the quality of primary education is developed there is no meaning of IIT/IIM.
The other thing why IIT/IIM is needed is also need to be understood. Our India is still a developing country plus we have the largest democracy system in the world so to run them we need smart policy makers and brains which can be provided only by quality education of IIT/IIM.
So I conclude the concern of govt. Should be balanced development of both the fields of education.
Ritika Krishna Savita
The problem is with the “not so good” standard, in comparision to the global standards.
The Government should target to condition the existing education system, to make the product better!
manish kumar
I would say that we can not compare IIT/IIM with primary education. This is because the scope of primary education is very vast while IIT/IIM are concerned with a small group of people in India. So I would say that the ultimate concern of government is to develop India and these both are necessary for the growth of India, so govt. Should work for development of both the fields of education.
I would not directly say that govt should stop financing to IIT/IIM but would say that most of the people going for these institutes are self capable, so govt. Should make them self financed. Why primary education is to be developed is also man imp. Question because a child does not join IIT/IIM from his birth. He first gets primary edu. & then on the basis of his capability he reaches to IIT/IIM, so unless the quality of primary education is developed there is no meaning of IIT/IIM.
The other thing why IIT/IIM is needed is also need to be understood. Our India is still a developing country plus we have the largest democracy system in the world so to run them we need smart policy makers and brains which can be provided only by quality education of IIT/IIM.
So I conclude the concern of govt. Should be balanced development of both the fields of education.
see iit or iim produce the most qualified and talented brains for our future but these brains only devlop from the grass root level i.e. primary education. its the matter of fact that, primary/secondary schools are more as compared to that of iits or iims…then say me why now also india is suffering from unemployment, poverty and the so called IILITERACY. thing is that we should focus on the quality of education not on the quantity of education. and this type of quality education can be epected from the primary education. if a child is not capable of pronouncing words like A,B,C… then how can we expect that he should say the formula of (A-B)^2…a tree grows only from its seed not its vice-vesa..so to see a beautiful tree we need to water the seed which we had put on the soil. like that only we need to polish those primary schools which were setup in our past rather than going for the set up of iits or iims.
thank you.